True Crime Tuesday: The Robison Family Murders

Please read the “TCT Disclaimer” under the True Crime tab at the top of the page before reading any true crime posts.

It’s week two of True Crime Tuesday and apparently I’m on some kind of family murdering spree kick. What’s that say about my mindset? Could it have anything to do with my teetering mental health because of the chaos that currently envelopes my entire home and marriage due to my oldest stepson’s all-consuming hurricane behaviour that is literally making it feel like I can’t fucking breathe and maybe my marriage won’t make it?

I digress. We certainly don’t have time to unpack all of that and delve into the psychology and Freudian slip-like choice of true crime tales I’m telling.

Everything is fine. No one is going to kill anyone in my house, unless it’s mentally and emotionally HAHAHA…

stressed awkward marketing GIF

Alright, here we go. The Robison Family Treehouse…no, murders. They’re all going to die in this one, so just prepare yourselves.


Summer, 1968. The worst mass murder in Michigan’s history is about to take place in the quiet lakeside community of Good Hart.

The Robisons – Richard and Shirley – were planning on spending their entire summer with their four children at their seasonal home, which may or may already sound like a nightmare depending on your family situation. The simple log cabin sat on the shore of Lake Michigan in the north woods. Secluded among tall pines and dense woods, the cabin was nearly impossible to see from the road.

At 42 years old, Richard Robison was a successful man. He was an advertising executive who owned a magazine called ‘Impesario.’ His wife, 40-year-old Shirley Robison, was a housewife. Their children, 19-year-old Richie, 16-year-old Gary, 12-year-old Randall and 7-year-old Susan had enjoyed a stable and privileged upbringing.

Only weeks into their family holiday, a bullet shattered the glass of a window in their cabin. Four more shots were fired, seemingly aimed at Richard Robison. With the patriarch dead, the killer entered the cabin through an unlocked door and killed the remaining family members, each getting a bullet to the head. Two different guns had been used and two family members, Richard Robison and his young daughter Susan, had been beaten with a hammer. Because what even is a murder spree if it doesn’t include a little overkill?


Author Mardi Link wrote in his book When Evil Came to Good Hart: “It looked like someone shot at the family while they were in the cabin from across the road through the window and they came around and came in through the lakeside door with a handgun and finished them off.”

The seclusion of the location was a gift to the killer, as they slipped away from the massacre, unseen.

The bodies of the Robison family lay dead for almost a month – a fucking month!!! – before they were discovered, leaving police with little in the way of forensic evidence due to decomposition. I don’t even picture it. Don’t think about it. A fucking month!!!

Combined with the state of forensic tools in 1968, there was little the police could learn about the crimes without witnesses. The gruesome murder scene inside the handcrafted cabin in Good Hart was only discovered when people in a neighbouring cabin began to detect a foul odour. I fucking bet they did.

The neighbours called on the caretaker, Chauncey Bliss, the man who had built the cabins in the area, and asked him to sort out the awful smell. Bliss expected to find a dead animal because in what world do you expect to find an entire murdered family? Instead, he walked into a slaughterhouse – six decaying bodies before him.


Shirley Robison’s body was intentionally posed to lead the police to assume that the crime was part of a sexual attack. I can’t find anymore details on that, but we can all assume what that means. Bloody footprints on the floor led investigators to conclude that only one person committed the murders. Pathologists were able to estimate, from the condition of the bodies, that they had been killed four weeks prior to their discovery, placing the date the Robison family was murdered on June 25, 1968.

With forensic evidence limited, the police’s first task was to look for motive. Why had the Robison family been targeted? Would anyone associated with them have had a reason to want the family dead? Police have always believed the main target of the murder was the patriarch, Richard Robison, which begs the question, if he was the target why did the murderer kill the entire family?

“Financial gain just doesn’t seem like it could possibly be the only motive for such a horrific display of violence against an entire family.” – Mardi Link

30-year-old Joseph Scolaro worked with Richard Robison. He was a staff member at the magazine who had been put in charge of Robison’s business affairs while he was on summer holiday. While in charge, police discovered Scolaro embezzled around $60,000 from his absent boss. In today’s terms, that’s about $435k.

With little other to go on as to why this family may have been murdered, Scolaro’s shady business dealings were the only lead and possible motive that the police had.


On the morning of the murders, police discovered multiple phone calls going back and forth between Robison and Scolaro. Their theory was that Scolaro had a plan to drive out to the cabin and kill the family before Robison could take action on the embezzlement. From the end of the last phone call, police believe that Scolaro had enough time to drive from Detroit to Good Hart. Scolaro could never provide a solid alibi for that time period to account for his movements.

According to Mardi Link, Scolaro said he was at a plumbing convention, which sounds like the literal worst convention you could go to, and spoke with a number of clients on the day, but no one remembers seeing him. When complying with a police conducted lie detector test, Scolaro failed twice and received inconclusive results on a third test. It was also noted in police records that he tried to deceive the polygraph interviewers in his pre-test interviews. I don’t even know what to make of this really, because lie detector tests are notorious bullshit, but still, don’t they just make the person seem super shady?

At the scene, police had found shell casings and a bloody footprint that they were sure had been left by the killer. A pair of shoes, found in Joe Scolaro’s possession, matched the shoe print left at the scene. However, despite the match, the police could not conclusively prove that it was Joe Scolaro who had been wearing the shoes during the murders. But again, that’s some shady circumstantial evidence.


A gun owned by Joe Scolaro, similar to one the police believed had been used in the murders, was found but the gun itself was not an exact match. Upon further investigation, police located a shooting range regularly used by Scolaro and found that the shell casings from the range did indeed match the casing from the crime scene. It was more evidence linking Joe Scolaro to the Robison family murders.

On December 17, 1969, the police presented their case, Evidence Case Report CR 4114-08-785-66, to the jurisdictional prosecution. Emmet County prosecutor Donald C. Noggle decided not to bring charges against Scolaro, citing the two missing murder weapons and the absence of his fingerprints from the crime scene. Was that the right call? Evidence was circumstantial at best, but in 1969, what evidence wasn’t circumstantial?

With no leads, no other evidence and no witnesses, the case grew cold. Four years later, a newly elected chief prosecutor, L. Brooks Patterson, reopened the prosecution and intended to have Scolaro arrested. Scolaro learned of the impending charges and arrest and on March 8th, 1973, police were called to his office, where his body was found, dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Next to his body was a typewritten suicide note. In it, he wrote: “I am a lier [sic] – a cheat- and a phony.” He included a list of people he had swindled in multiple business schemes. He then added a handwritten note addressed to his mother. In it, he said: “I had nothing to do with the Robisons—I’m a liar but not a murderer—I’m sick and scared—God and everyone please forgive me.

Since Michigan law does not permit an open murder case to be officially closed without an arrest, the suicide of the prime suspect placed the case in “inactive” status. Over the many years that have passed, other crime theories have surfaced but to date, none has ever been substantiated.

Technically, the remains unsolved.

Other suspects were considered. The caretaker, Chauncey Bliss, was briefly looked at. He had found the bodies, he knew the family was at the cabin, and being the man who built the cabin, he knew the layout and the surrounding area well. But, coming up with a motive never produced likely answers.  Bliss had lost a son in a motorbike accident before the Robison’s were murdered. Some have suggested Bliss was angry with Richard Robison over his response to his son’s death, but I can’t find any information that would suggest Bliss and Richard were especially close that Richard should have done anything more than expressed regret for the son’s passing.

Another name to surface is John Norman Collins – who I’ll talk in the next edition of True Crime Tuesday!! – a man believed to be responsible for a series of murders between 1967 and 1969 in Southeastern Michigan. His victims were all teenage girls who were abducted, beaten, raped and murdered, so what the fuck would he have to do with the Robison murders? It’s tedious at best.

Collins was only convicted of one murder in 1970, however, he is believed to be responsible for all murders linked to the Michigan Murderer. Collins was suggested as a suspect in the Robison family murders due to a connection with the family’s eldest son Richie. Both attended the same University in Eastern Michigan and it is possible they knew each other. But without motive, and without a fit to his known M.O., Collins was discarded as a viable suspect in this case.

Those who personally knew Mr. Robison were quoted in police reports as saying they had never known a better family man, friend, or business partner, and in their minds, the case was and is closed as they believe Scolaro is the one responsible.

So, while many believe the killer has been identified, justice for this family will likely never come, and the individual who took six lives has gotten away with murder.

Tell me, do you believe it was Scolaro? Someone else from the list or someone I didn’t mention at all?

Personally, the hammer bit is what gets me. Shooting someone is cold, impersonal. But bashing their heads in with a hammer is so up close and personal, it requires a certain amount of rage and hatred. Someone must have really hated Richard Robison.

Stay safe. Be Kind. But, take no shit.

Later, Murderinos ✌️🔪

2 thoughts on “True Crime Tuesday: The Robison Family Murders

  1. Late yr. 66/early 67. Blue Grey (size like a Camaro 69)
    Strange circle or angles rear windows. HFCC, Dearborn Campus/U of M – next door, some class or workshop auto


  2. I have so many questions regarding Joe Scolero. Not that there isn’t motive, but there is evidence to suggest something else happened here.
    What sticks out to me is the bludgeoning of just the youngest of the children Susan, and her Father. This to me indicates some kind of rage towards these two family members in particular.
    The handwriting of the note left on the door does not match the handwriting of the note left by Joe Scolaro at all. Am I a handwriting expert? No, but clearly they are written by two different people. Which leads me to more questions. Was this note left on the cabin door left by the killer. If so why. To deter anyone who happens by. And if so why? To buy some time? Someplace so remote it could be days before they were discovered. What would days vs. a month, (I’m sure not even the killer imagined it would be this long), matter? Scolaro may not know that and may of left this note. But…If it was written in a hurry in fear of being discovered, why did the killer take time to put cardboard over the bullet hole and move the bodies? Scolero would of got out of Dodge and make his long trip home and come up with an alibi. Or, was covering the bullet hole and moving the bodies done after the fact and the killer returned? A local? Why were the bodies moved to the hallway? Seems only the bodies visible from a window were moved. Why again? To buy time? A lot of time. To maybe get rid of them and clean up so to give an assumption if ever questioned to a family disappearing they left safely? Perhaps not ever getting a chance with other family’s coming North to vacation? Indicating a local. If the note on the door was Scolaro’s, and the writing so bad because he wrote it in haste to get out. Why did we spend so much more time in the cabin after?
    What if the note was wrote by Richard Robinson? I had Property in upper MI. Caretakers are hired to plow snow and mow the lawn. Caretakers are notified when a resident is coming to ensure this is done. Was the note left by Robinson to ensure this was done upon the Family’ return? Why had the caretaker not been on the property for what turned out to be a very lengthy time? Had he mowed this lawn for an expected return of 7/10, and they were presumed dead 6/25. It would of been a bit stinky. Where was he for a month??? Many killers let someone else discover a body? Why does this handwriting not match on these 2 pieces of evidence?
    Why were the Father and youngest child, Susan bludgeoned with such hatred? Why was the Mother covered with a blanket if bludgeoning is the preferred method of pure hatred? Was she sexually assaulted? Hard to know after all that time decomposing. Doesn’t sound posed to me.I think yes. Covered up out of remorse. Perhaps the only one liked. Or even cared for. I can’t even get to why if the initial shot was from across the street why the boys did not make it to the closet with their weapon in the cabin. If the bodies were moved later, and the Father shot first across the street. Why didn’t they make it? Could the bodies indeed of been moved later. And a shot taken from outside after (and covered with cardboard after) to make it look like It began outside? And that’s where it actually ended? Was there cardboard in the cabin? Or was it brought later? Could the killer of been inside to begin with? Why didn’t the boys make it? They were not tampered with. Incidental, insignificant, not important, not visible from a porch window peeker.If he shot him from outside why go in? Target hit. Leave. Confirmed? No, but hit and probably. Leave. Why was only Mr Robinson and Susan bludgeoned. Some people hate little children and little things they do. Could the motive be something very small? Somebody was trying to buy time for later. Not during the incident. So so many questions. It doesn’t all add up to Scolero. I don’t know.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s